Thursday, August 12, 2010

Food for Thought

HERE IS THE TEXT OF MAYOR LEO LUTZ' LETTER TO COLUMBIA BOROUGH COUNCIL CONCERNING THE CABINS ALONG THE SUSQUEHANNA RIVER.


During the next several months you will be making the second most important decision that has been made in my nine years working for Columbia Borough. The first major decision was the purchase and sale of the property at Third and Linden Street. I believe we all can agree that this was the right thing to do toward jump starting the Economic Development and Revitalization in Columbia Borough.

Now Columbia Borough has been offered the gift of three parcels of land owned by the Safe Harbor Power and Water commonly known as the River Cottages. The decision will be hat do we do with this gift and what is the right thing to do? I have thought long and hard about this decision and listened to many discussions and ideas on the subject.

Columbia Borough must show it is serious by completing projects such as constructing a building at River Park, purchasing the adjoining 14 acres of land between the bridges, increasing parking by purchasing and demolishing the building between the Market House and the Market House parking lot and completing the Downtown Beautification project.

These projects and the theory behind completing these projects are noted in the soon to be finalized Economic Development Strategic Plan and Comprehensive Plan. Both plans have been developed by residents throughout all walks of life in Columbia Borough with a common goal; creating a sense of place, that place where we all want to live and call home.

With this in mind, I have heard or thought of three different scenarios on what to do with the gifting from Safe Harbor Power and Water and how to create the funding necessary to complete started or stalled projects. Allow me to outline these and include my assessment of each.

One: Take the gifting from Safe Harbor and place the property up for sale to the highest bidder. This will create capitol, but may take a generation to see the full economic impact if any. As seen in the purchase and sale of the Third and Linden property this option is very time consuming on personnel at a time when we need to have other projects moving and may take years to complete the transaction. Also, the development that may take place may not be in the best interests of Columbia Borough. This is not the right thing to do to the people who have been there for generations and noted is part of the historic fabric of Columbia Borough.

Two: Take the gifting from Safe Harbor and continue to lease the property to the cottage owners. This option will not create the capitol needed to do these projects planned or stalled. Additionally the expenses of becoming a landlord such as taxes, maintenance and installation of roads and infrastructure will off-set monies collected on leases. This is not the right thing to do.

Third: Take the gifting from Safe Harbor and sell to the Cottage Owners Association through the Columbia Economic Development Corporation in the same manner as the Turkey Hill Experience. This can be a fast transaction creating the needed capitol for projects and when combined with grant funding already awarded can jump start further economic development, business retention and recreational opportunities for residents and visitors. The amount the Cottage Owners Association has offered Safe Harbor can be used to complete projects as noted above such as:

Constructing a building at River Park with restrooms and deck. DCNR has indicated $165,000 could be realized for such a project provided Columbia Borough can provide a match. This would allow for the construction of a $320,000 building. There is a possibility of additional funding to complete the entire building but Columbia Borough would have to make the initial investment.

Purchase the 14 acres between the bridges from Norfolk Southern. Columbia Borough has made an offer to Norfolk Southern. If the offer is refused and Columbia Borough cannot invest the monies to purchase, we will lose a $30,000 grant from DCNR that is to be used for the purchase and funding from the Lancaster County Urban Enhancement Fund to be used for the planning phase. $100,000 may be needed for this transaction to be completed. This may be a once in a lifetime opportunity to purchase the lands and complete the footprint of River Park.

Complete the Downtown Beautification Project. The completion of this project has been cited by both residents and businesses alike as an important part in the economic development and revitalization of Columbia Borough. The project is also listed, as are the others in the Economic Development Strategic Plan. The lights have been purchased with a grant from Senator Brubaker but cannot be installed properly without the other part of the project such as new conduit, curb and sidewalk reconstruction and tree planting. Completion of this project may cost $150,000.

By my calculations, that leaves roughly $200,000 to purchase and demolish the building across the alley from the Market House and adjacent to the new Market House parking lot and expand the lot. Additionally, the borough could offer the front portion of the lot to an entity to construct a mixed use businesses/residence properties on the South Third Street portion of the lot. This would offset the cost, allow for more economic development in other areas, increase the tax base, eliminate curb cuts, increase business and residential opportunities and fill the void in the streetscape. This is the right thing to do.

I believe if you sharpen your pencils a bit with these suggestionsm you may even have enough money left to retire the latest borrowing taken on by council.

Please give these thoughts and scenarios some serious thought. This may be a once in a lifetime opportunity to create the Columbia Borough we all would like to live in and have new business and residents invest in. We can also create the sense of place, that place we proudly call home if we do the right thing.

Leo S. Lutz
Mayor

12 comments:

Anonymous said...

even the mayors letter says they rent the land is owned by safe harbor not 37 people so i think these people need to stop saying they own they dont. maybe we should act like all the section 8 people own to. quit nocking thoses owners. but this is columbia and we will set double standards when it fits our own personal greed.

Anonymous said...

I for one do not see my taxes going down or staying stable at any time soon. because of ALL these PROJECTS,COTTAGES,WASTED GRANT MONIES,MORE TAX PAYER MONIES being wasted!! YES, we want Columbia to look beautiful but, we need to put are tax dollars,grant money, and any other monies into roads, lowering are school taxes, making it easier for people to own their homes instead of haveing to rent! Just another thought, BUY out the Columbia Water Company! look at the money the borough could be collecting in for years!! :O) Robert

Anonymous said...

Does anyone even have a half a clue of what they're talking about? Countless posts have said it before and I'll say it one more time in hopes it eventually sinks in far enough to be comprehended. They DO NOT RENT! THEY LEASE! A lease means they hold the same rights to the land as a land owner meaning they pay taxes. Not like section 8 so nice try with the comparison but you fall pathetically short. On top of LEASING...THEY OWN...that's right OWN the buildings. Some of them have invested tens of thousands of dollars into making those places look nice and respectible. wish I could say the same for some of the other junk holes I see around town. Heck, if most people in this town cared as much about keeping care of their places as much as the COTTAGE OWNERS (if you forget already please refer to my earlier sentence)then you would have one bautiful town to live in.

chris will said...

hi Leo if you are out there and read this. I am not sure I fully understand your option 2 thoughts.
1) Is there a legal reason that roads would need to be improved if the boro owns the property?. 2) Taxes would be collected on either of the 3 options by the boro.
3) I don't know what the current lease amount is or the lease end dates but The boro should be able to make money on owning the property.

I like option 2 the best. I understand that selling the property to get money right now has the benefits that you mentioned but there is a limited amount of river front available and I believe that some day in the future the boro could use this land to benefit all citizens of Columbia.

Anonymous said...

Lets not forget the behind the scene meeting the mayor had with select cottage OWNERS. As far as his statement he read , it was on boro letterhead wich makes it an offical boro document.This is an illegal meeting with cottage owners/ a cottage owner was spotted with the same speech at the meeting ,with the mayors same last name.something STINKS!!!

Anonymous said...

I agree with Cris - it would be foolish to sell this away from our future generations and Leo would go down in History as an idiot. Nothing wrong with a five or ten year lease agreement with the cottage owners to protect them a bit. If the land is given to Columbia, it is given to our grandchldren and great grandchildren whom aren't even born yet and it would be criminal to sell it away from them.

Anonymous said...

hey, don't forget the 14 acres of land between the 2 bridges that the boro has already made an offer on to norfolk southern

Anonymous said...

Just a thought , do you need FLOOD INSURANCE,SEWER and WATER hook-up, if the borough sells the cottages to the cabin people. Tim

Anonymous said...

I agree with the 14 acres. Columbia only has a small window to get the matching grant money to buy that land. If they keep the land the cabins are on they're more than likely not going to have the funding thus throwing the 14 acres AND the grant money right out the window. Then they'll be left with about 9 acres (they already took some of it) that isn't even connected to the river park because of the water company. So I agree, there IS only a limited amount of shoreline so why wouldn't they sell and get more bang for their buck? 14 acres connected to the river park as opposed to 9 that isn't sure sounds like a no brainer to me.

Anonymous said...

Tim, they already have flood insurance and water. If I'm correct all that would be needed would be sewer.

Anonymous said...

i agree that the boro should purchase the 14 acres between the 2 bridges from norfolk southern, actually, there may be some news on this by now. this was the original plan and boro spent thousands of dollars to draw up plans for the 14 acre tract. yes, it is a no brainer

Anonymous said...

Has Norfolk Southern ever give a price, or is this a pipedream.....